PFA at the Bishopsgate Institute
The relationship between PFA and the Mary Ward Centre having now been terminated, as rooms for PFA are no longer available there, our new home for Saturday debates is the Bishopsgate Institute, 230 Bishopsgate,
City of London,
EC2M 4QH.
All discussions are on Saturdays, from 2.30 to 4 pm.
In our discussions, a topic is introduced by a speaker (or speakers) who will normally speak for less than twenty minutes before opening the topic to the floor and moderating the ensuing discussion.
No booking necessary, just turn up on the day.
Date |
Speaker |
Topic |
| Sat 25 Feb |
Richard Baron |
Constitutional monarchy: yes or no? |
In Britain, the Government gets its power from a Parliament that we all elect. At the same time,
the monarch is a non-partisan figure we can all respect. That all sounds great. On the other hand,
the very idea of a monarch, someone set above us by accident of birth and long-ago battles, is an
insult to the equal status of all of us. And the Government can call itself the Crown, get grand ideas,
exercise a vast range of powers, and drag Parliament along behind it. How did we get to where we
are now? What sort of philosophical beliefs about government and power could justify our current
system? And should we arrange things differently? |
| |
|
|
| Sat 24 Mar |
Anja Steinbauer |
"Philosopher-Kings": cultural icons and celebrity cult?
|
Kings, said Plato, are more than just rulers. There is another way in which they may impact on the
lives of individuals: They set an example to people. We learn by looking at others and monarchs tend
to be particularly visible. Today royals are celebrities next to movie stars and singers. What they
have in common is that people look to them as models when making decisions about what to wear,
buy or do. But who is well equipped to serve as such a cultural icon? Would you agree with Plato
that "philosophers should be kings"? |
| |
|
|
| Sat 21 Apr |
Rick Lewis |
Philosophy and Scary Monarchs |
Many philosophers believed monarchs to be dangerous and unpredictable. Enlightenment philosopher Thomas Hobbes even likened absolute monarchs to monsters. Niccolo Machiavelli teaches us that “Princes and governments are far more dangerous than other elements within society.” Yet many of them believed monarchy to be the most efficient and stable form of government. Is monarchy inherently flawed? Does it have distinct advantages over democracy? We will discuss ideas about monarchy by philosophers as diverse as Aristotle, Machiavelli and Bertrand Russell. |
| |
|
|
| Sat 23 Jun |
Anja Steinbauer |
Mind and muscles: can philosophy learn from sport? |
Ideas and physical force, mind and muscles – at first glance these seem completely
incompatible realms. However, some interesting voices claim the opposite: “All I know
most surely about morality and obligations, I owe to football.”, said the Existentialist thinker and
former national goal keeper Albert Camus. The famous philosopher and Olympic gold medallist
Hans Lenk believes that looking to our experiences in the realm of sport can uniquely teach us about
the function of enthusiasm and the nature of authentic achievement. – Should philosophers be
athletes and athletes philosophers?
|
|